Creditors Rights & Bankruptcy
SARE in Bankruptcy Cases
What is the significance of a "single asset real estate" bankruptcy case?

SARE stands for "Single Asset Real Estate" and is used to describe a bankruptcy case involving a debtor that owns a single real estate parcel or project. Specifically, Section 101(51B) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that SARE means real property constituting a single property or project, which generates substantially all of the debtor's gross income and on which no substantial business is being conducted other than the business of operating the real property.

Read our client alert.

 
Arizona Anti-Deficiency Changes Repealed
On September 4, 2009, Governor Jan Brewer signed a repeal of the new amendment to the anti-deficiency law. This move comes weeks before the new amendment was to take effect.

The amendment had changed Arizona's anti-deficiency law to restrict residential real estate investors and developers from availing themselves of anti-deficiency protection. It would have allowed lenders to pursue deficiency actions against borrowers or guarantors if no certificate of occupancy had been issued for the property, or if the borrower or guarantor had not utilized the property as a one or two family home for at least six consecutive months. Importantly, the new amendment put the burden of proving these conditions on the borrower or guarantor.

The repeal of the amendment has left Arizona's anti-deficiency law unchanged. Now, as before, a lender cannot recover a deficiency following a trustee's sale if the trust property consists of two and one-half acres or less and is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling.

For questions regarding the impact and application of the repeal of the new anti-deficiency legislation, please contact a member of our Bankruptcy, Creditors' Rights, and Real Estate Lending group
 
New Anti-Deficiency Law in Arizona

Arizona Senate Bill 1271

On July 10, 2009, Governor Jan Brewer signed a new anti-deficiency law that will apply to lenders' deficiency actions brought after completion of a trustee's sale under a deed of trust. The new law will become effective September 30, 2009.

Currently, a lender cannot recover a deficiency following a trustee's sale if the trust property consists of two and one-half acres or less and is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling. This law has been interpreted to extend protection to investors and developers who own such property, even if the property is not used as anyone's permanent residence.

The new anti-deficiency law will limit a borrower/guarantor's ability to seek the protection of the anti-deficiency statute by inserting two additional conditions: 1) a certificate of occupancy must have been issued for the property, and 2) the trustors themselves must have utilized the property as a one or two family home for at least six consecutive months. Importantly for lenders, it is the trustor who must prove that both of these new conditions have been met.

It appears that the new law will allow lenders to pursue a deficiency after completion of trustee's sales of investment properties, rental homes, and spec homes that were never occupied by the trustor. Lenders will also be able to seek a deficiency after trustee's sales of partially completed homes that have not yet been issued a certificate of occupancy.

The new anti-deficiency law does not contain language that limits its application to deficiency actions brought under loans entered into, or trustee's sale started, after September 30, 2009. It is therefore possible that the new requirements will apply to all deficiency actions arising from trustee's sales completed after September 30, 2009, regardless of when the loan transaction or trustee's sale was initiated. There are several additional uncertainties that arise from the enactment of the new law. For questions regarding the impact and application of the new anti-deficiency legislation, please contact a member of our Bankruptcy, Creditors' Rights, and Real Estate Lending group.

John J. Fries
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | 602) 440-4819

Alexandra E. Hicks
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4859

John A. Hink
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4835

David J. Itzkowitz
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4814 W.

Scott Jenkins, Jr.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4890

James D. O'Neil
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4805

Andrea M. Palmer
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4850

Michael P. Ripp
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4823

Melissa Schmucker
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4880

Allison Nicole Weyer
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it | (602) 440-4833

 

 

 
Creditors Rights and Bankruptcy News
Recorded Judgment Fails to Create Lien on Homestead: Alternative Collection Methods for the Judgment Creditor --- Read the March 2009 Update.
 

Copyright 2007 - 2010
Ryley Carlock & Applewhite. A Professional Association. All rights reserved.