There's an old saying that long case titles make good law.  Well, we can add to the list the case of Autotech Technologies Limited Partnership v. Automationdirect.com, 2008 WL 902957 (N.D. Ill. April. 2, 2008).

In response to defendant's document request, plaintiff produced, among other things, a hard copy and PDF copy of a document entitled "EZTouch File Structure."  Plaintiff unsuccessfully moved to compel a copy of the document in its native Microsoft® Word format with accompanying metadata.  The court, citing Rule 34 and The Sedona Principles, held that plaintiff was not entitled to any further production since its document demand failed to specify a form of production. "[Plaintiff] was the master of its production request; it must be satisfied with what it asked for."